1: We wrapped up our brief unit of fallacies by sharing your findings regarding the Republican debate, which had its fair share of dogmatism, faulty analogy, appeal to pity, straw man, and red herring. After this reminder of what not to do, we entered the land of argument by reviewing the characteristics of a strong claim, evidence, and warrants. We will practice these stages during tomorrow's class, and then move into our first argument for Educator or Employee of the Year.
3: We spent the hour focusing on the initial phases of argument: claim, evidence, warrant. With that knowledge reviewed, we started our first practice argument with brainstorming possible school schedules. During next class, we will work in groups to create claims, evidence, and warrants for the varying schedules and then move into the Educator/Employee of the Year argument.
5: After sharing some of our spectacular claims, evidence, and super warrants, we spent the rest of the class receiving background for the Educator/Employee of the Year argument, looking at ways to construct this real world essay to its best advantage (3-4 paragraphs with 1 paragraph clarifying a personal connection and 1 paragraph looking at the full school community), and starting the essay. You will have time to write your first draft during the majority (not all) of class tomorrow. So, you are more than welcome to work on this over night in order to fine tune tomorrow. Absentees, if you are not comfortable writing the first draft yet, you should definitely have selected your nominee and brainstormed evidence in order to write during class.
No comments:
Post a Comment